[news.eclipse.tools.emf] Re: Question about setting resource and contain

["Tomas Malik" <malikt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Done, it is bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=41907

Regards,

Tom

"Shu Wang" <shu@xxxxxxxxxx> pí¹e v diskusním pøíspìvku
news:bi66v6$8ic$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tomas,
>
> Thanks for point out an EMF bug.
> The container will be set before attached() is called. Please open
> a bugzilla defect. We will fix in EMF 1.1.1. release.
>
> Regards,
> Shu
>
>
> "Tomas Malik" <malikt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:bi5a2j$akg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I implemented subclass of XMIResourceImpl that sets ID for every EObject
> in
> > it based on containers names (e.g. container1.container2.Element) and
> > implemented it into method setID(EObject eObject, String id).
> >
> > But when adding new element to container (which results in adding it to
> > resource as well f ollowing steps occur:
> >
> > 1. create element E
> > 2. add it to container C  (e.g. E.setContainer(C))
> > 3. method setting container calls method eBasicSetContainer
> (E.eContainer()
> > returns C)
> > 4. method eBasicSetContainer (implementation in EObjectImpl ) calls
> > newResource.attached(this) at this point E.eContainer() returns null
> > 5. method attached() calls, among other methods, setID()
> > 6. eBasicSetContainer method ends and again E.eContainer() returns C
> >
> > My questions are:
> >  Is this behaviour necessary that when adding to resource there is no
> > container set and then it is being set back?
> >  Is there better place to set ID to EObject in Resource? a.k.a. Am I
> missing
> > here something ? :)
> >
> >
> > Thaks in advance for your help,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > I am using EMF 1.0.2
> > For specific reasons, which would take quite a time to explain, I cannot
> use
> > URIfragment based referencing
> >
> >
> >
>
>