[news.eclipse.tools.cdt] Re: Announcing - "CDT for Windows"

["Paul McConkey" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The whole Subclipse/Subversive thing is unfortunate and I suspect that 
choosing one will never satisfy more than 50% of users (I use Subclipse).

As Subversive is the 'official' client, I suggest that this is the one that 
is included, if you _have_ to include one. This could have the side effect 
of making Subversive the de-facto Subversion client for CDT users, which may 
be a good thing if Polarion are able to properly progress the project.

However, it may be better to leave the Subversion client out altogether, 
because I suspect that it may be difficult to replace Subversive with 
Subclipse if you are so inclined. After all, installing either client is 
really very straightforward.

Cheers,

Paul.

"Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:f72qom$ddl$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mikhail Barg wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Doug Schaefer wrote:
>>> To be honest, I was surprised it wasn't there. As of Eclipse 3.3, the 
>>> CVS support is not part of the Eclipse platform. I'll definitely 
>>> consider adding it, and maybe one of the Subversion clients as well.
>>
>> Well, adding Subversion support would be really great!
>>
>
> The question I have is which client? Subclipse or Subversive. Subclipse 
> has been around longer, but Subversive is trying to become an official 
> Eclipse project. I've tried both and neither make me very happy. Which one 
> do you guys prefer?
>
> Doug.