news.eclipse.technology.xsd

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: How to copy XSDSchema object

marcin_cylke@xxxxxxx (Marcin Cylke) — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:59:32 GMT

Ok, thanks for your answer, I'll rework that class.

Marcin

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: How to copy XSDSchema object

Ed.Merks@xxxxxxx (Ed Merks) — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:56:49 GMT

Marcin,

Comments below.

Marcin Cylke wrote:

Hello
What I'm trying to achieve is create a class extending XSDSchema and put some convenience functions in it.

That sounds like a bad idea.

I want to have my own interface to XSDSchema object. This part is done, but I have a hard time loading content into such object. Normaly I would do: XSDParser xsdParser1 = new XSDParser(null);

You should load schemas using an XSDResourceImpl, not this way.

xsdParser1.parse(uri);
XSDSchema schm = xsdParser1.getSchema();
But since I want to pack that schema into my own object how should I do this?

You should not want to do that. It's a bad idea and you already see why. You can't ensure that the rest of the framework will create instances of your derived class.

I tried extending XSDParser to return my object when getSchema() is called, but it just doesn't work - it returns empty XSDSchema.

It would suffice to copy one schema to another, since my object is XSDSchema object on steroids ;-)

Even the XML Schema specification makes the schema definition final, so again, it's a really bad idea.

Do you have any ideas about this kind of problem?

Yes, avoid it completely. Put your convenience functions in a convenient separate class.


Marcin

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] How to copy XSDSchema object

marcin_cylke@xxxxxxx (Marcin Cylke) — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:06:49 GMT

Hello

What I'm trying to achieve is create a class extending XSDSchema and put some convenience functions in it. I want to have my own interface to XSDSchema object. This part is done, but I have a hard time loading content into such object.

Normaly I would do:
XSDParser xsdParser1 = new XSDParser(null);
xsdParser1.parse(uri);
XSDSchema schm = xsdParser1.getSchema();

But since I want to pack that schema into my own object how should I do this?

I tried extending XSDParser to return my object when getSchema() is called, but it just doesn't work - it returns empty XSDSchema.

It would suffice to copy one schema to another, since my object is XSDSchema object on steroids ;-)

Do you have any ideas about this kind of problem?

Marcin

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: WSDL Validator issue

valentinbaciu@xxxxxxx (Valentin) — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:24:19 GMT

Hi Khaled, the WTP WSDL tools, the validator included, conform to the WSDL 
schema provided by the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1.  See the last paragraph here 
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html#WSDL_Extensions.

As you've pointed out, some of the WS* specifications require extensibility 
elements in places not supported by the original WSDL 1.1 W3C note. The 
underlying Java object models used to manipulate WSDL (JWSDL/WSDL4J and the 
WTP WSDL EMF model) have also evolved to allow extensibility elements for 
all WSDL elements.

I hope this helps.
Regards, Valentin

"khaled sharief"  wrote in message 
news:b1ef36f70688811ff5686162e3ab8b0b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi Ed,
>
> This is the version of WTP that I'm using.
> Version: 3.0.3.v200809250443
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mohammad Khaled Sharief
>

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: WSDL Validator issue

khaledsharief@xxxxxxx (khaled sharief) — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:29:42 GMT

Hi Ed,

This is the version of WTP that I'm using.
Version: 3.0.3.v200809250443

Thanks & Regards,
Mohammad Khaled Sharief

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: WSDL Validator issue

Ed.Merks@xxxxxxx (Ed Merks) — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:41:52 GMT

Khaled,

This is the XSD newsgroup, not a WSDL newsgroup. It's best to ask on the Web Tools newsgroup, which I've added to the "to" list of the reply, so no need to repost. You might want to clarify which version of WTP you're using.

khaled sharief wrote:

Hi,
As per WSDL 1.1 Spec its not valid to have extensibility elements in the porttype element but when i place any extensibility element in porttype e.g.
     
the validator doesn't report any problem. This is also the same in Altova XML Spy.

Did i miss anything in the specification or will this be a bug in WSDL validator and Altova XML Spy validator.
Reference - http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#A3
Regards,
Khaled Sharief

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] WSDL Validator issue

khaledsharief@xxxxxxx (khaled sharief) — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:23:38 GMT

Hi,

As per WSDL 1.1 Spec its not valid to have extensibility elements in the porttype element but when i place any extensibility element in porttype e.g.

the validator doesn't report any problem. This is also the same in Altova XML Spy.

Did i miss anything in the specification or will this be a bug in WSDL validator and Altova XML Spy validator.

Reference - http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#A3

Regards,
Khaled Sharief

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] UML to XSD

ankit.jindal@xxxxxxx (Ankit Jindal) — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:31:22 GMT

Hi,

I want to convert UML to XSD but I am unable to do so in Eclipse Version: 3.4.2. My ultimate goal is to generate wsdl from this UML. Thank you in advance. -- Ankit

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Re: Defining mulitple persistency for EMF Model from one xsd

Ed.Merks@xxxxxxx (Ed Merks) — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:23:26 GMT

Ashwani,

Please don't ask the same question in multiple newsgroups with different posts. This is already answered in the EMF newsgroup.

Ashwani Kr Sharma wrote:

Hi,
I have defined my metamodel in a xsd file. The metamodel is something like following: Company contains 1..n Employees. Each employee has 1..n Responsibility.
I created a EMF model based on this. I generated code from this.
Now, the editor which gets generated - Is for files of type extensions
- Allows me to Add Employees and Add Responsibility to Employee
Now, the complete info is stored in one file of extensios .company.
I want to store the information in two files.
    -> .company     -> .employee
Is it possible ? OR Do i need to have two xsd, one for metamodel of company and one for metamodel of employee ?
Regards,
Ashwani Kr Sharma

[news.eclipse.technology.xsd] Defining mulitple persistency for EMF Model from one xsd

ashw.kumar@xxxxxxx (Ashwani Kr Sharma) — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:13:33 GMT

Hi,

I have defined my metamodel in a xsd file. The metamodel is something like following: Company contains 1..n Employees. Each employee has 1..n Responsibility.

I created a EMF model based on this. I generated code from this. Now, the editor which gets generated - Is for files of type extensions - Allows me to Add Employees and Add Responsibility to Employee

Now, the complete info is stored in one file of extensios .company. I want to store the information in two files. -> .company -> .employee

Is it possible ? OR Do i need to have two xsd, one for metamodel of company and one for metamodel of employee ?

Regards,
Ashwani Kr Sharma