[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Newsgroup Home]
[news.eclipse.technology.swordfish] Re: difference Swordfish vs. current SOPERA?

Christian Mauro wrote:
Hi,

can anyone tell me what will be the difference between the first version of Swordfish in comparison to SOPERA 2.2?

thanx
Chris

Chris,

Swordfish will provide a framework for SOA runtime environments. It will implement the basic functionality you need to actually run an SOA platform. It will also provide extension points that abstract specific functionality (e.g., service lookup, policy processing). Swordfish will provide sample implementations for these extensions, but they are really meant to be replaced with more powerful implementations by someone who is customizing the framework to suit his own needs.

Currently we're refactoring the original SOPERA core library that you can find in the initial contribution to support the degree of modularity I've sketched out.

SOPERA ASF is a full featured SOA platform, currently including the core library and Swordfish when it is released, with runtime environment and tooling. It is extending the basic SOA capabilities with service lookup via a Service Registry, policy-based matching of providers and consumers, a central configuration system, system activity monitoring capabilities and much more. We're currently preparing the first open source release that is scheduled for end of March.

As an aside I'd like to mention that SOPERA's tooling components that are applicable from SOPERA will be contributed to the SOA Tools Project (http://www.eclipse.org/stp). We've already contributed our policy editor and proposed a general validation framework (http://wiki.eclipse.org/STP_Validation_Framework).

If you have more questions, please post them on this newsgroup.

best regards

	Jerry