Christian Campo wrote:
> <stuff deleted>
>> But I understand that Riena is just getting going, so maybe as
things get more established if you could just post your test results on
a bug somewhere as you do them that would be helpful.
> I think that is a big difference between ECF and communication that
we do. We don't
> have mechanism to recover without user interaction if only half of a
HTTP request is
> sent. Also that nearly never happens since we work connectionless.
Working 'connectionless' doesn't by any means prevent network failures
though...it just means the failures aren't detected until
connect/request/response time...so like I said it would be useful to
understand the failure behavior...when it does occur...while using
unreliable networks (more likely to have it occur).
> So we are creating
> a connection for each and every request.
> We done extensive performance testing on Hessian and the whole
application environment.
> We used several professional performance tools that can simulate the
random but scripted behaviour of several
> thousand users in parallel. So we feel quit comfortable that Hessian
will not be a performance
> issue and performs very well.
> We published a number of articles on Client Server applications and
Hessian in specific in a german
> publication "Java Magazine" and just recently in the current issue a
description of our performance studies.
ok. Still, if you are able, reporting things on a riena bug would be
useful as well...as then others could report such tests also.