[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
[News.eclipse.technology.packaging] Re: Welcome to eclipse.technology.packaging
|
Thanks, John - and yes, you are right, some of these questions are out of
scope of this project.
But to give you answers to your questions:
(1) A set of features/plugins could be bundled in a zip/tar archive and
distributed to your users. A tooling for this is one goal of this project.
(2) Special configurations are not included in our project proposal, but it
should be easy to put them in the 'plugin_customization.ini' file. In your
case it is probably in your org.eclipse.platform plugin.
(3) Example projects: In my opinion the easiest way is a project import from
a central location (CVS, a zip file, ...)
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Markus
John Cooney wrote:
> I was glad to see this project proposal, but have a few questions that
> don't appear to be in scope based on the proposal. Are there guidelines
> or standards on how workspaces can be packaged/shared? My usecase is that
> I have a set of features/plugins to roll out to some new users. I'd like
> to get them started as soon as possible with a configuration that is tuned
> to a new user. Examples of some things included; other s/w distributions
> like the JDK and Tomcat, a sample project so people can kick the tires on
> the plugins, and some customizations like having some snippets
> prepoulated. Is there something better than workspaces to manage this?
>
> We fixed the location and included the workspace, but this isn't very
> flexible. We didn't want to force the users through steps like updating
> the preferences to point to the proper location for the Tomcat
> installation and change the project properties to set JSF library
> references. How is this handled elsewhere? Installing the workspace and
> then making changes for a new install location appeared to be messy.
> Importing the projects didn't do the trick because the users would still
> have a decent amount of configuration to take care of on their own.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> John