[news.eclipse.technology.ohf] Re: XCA with NIST's public registry

[jesse.pangburn@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jesse Pangburn)]

Hi Sarah,
If you mean NIST did not implement one at Connecathon, that's true.  
However, Bill has been working on a receiving gateway integrated with his 
registry.  Are you on the ihe-xds-implementers google group?  I've gotten 
the occasional posting about it on that list.  
http://ihewiki.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/XDS_Main_Page#Important_URLs_.2F__WS_Endpoints 
there's a link to the urls for the endpoints.

So in any case, it seems from your answer that no, you guys have not 
tested with it :-)  Anyone else?

Is the bridge acting as an initiating gateway?  Or does it need an 
initiating gateway to talk to which would then turn around and talk to 
NIST's receiving gateway?

thanks,
Jesse

Sarah Knoop wrote:

> Good question ... To my knowledge, NIST did not implement an XCA 
> Gateway, making it difficult for anyone to test an XCA-enabled XDS.b 
> Consumer. The profile also faced a fair number of CPs this year around 
> the expectations/handling of homeCommunityId - so that should shape 
> things for this next round, albeit experimental - perhaps not so 'highly 
> experimental' :-)

> - Sarah



> Jesse Pangburn wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Have you guys tried the bridge XCA code with NIST's public registry?  I 
> > have not yet but was curious if you guys had, or if there's been any 
> > work on it since the "highly experimental" stage it was in at US 
> > Connectathon 2008?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Jesse