[news.eclipse.technology.linuxtools] Re: Using autoheader and libtoolize

[Lorenzo Bettini <bettini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>
> > Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > > I had forgotten about AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
> > >
> > > > Anyway, I am not arguing about adding autoheader support, just that 
> > > > the search for autogen.sh in the current logic is valid and needs to 
> > > > be kept.  If a project has an autogen.sh file, it should be run.  If 
> > > > it doesn't, then running autoheader is a logical next step as the 
> > > > steps above may or may not have been done.
> > >
> > > I meant autoreconf, not autoheader above :)
>
> > yes, I had inferred that ;-)
>
> FYI, I have just added the support into trunk which will be for 
> Galileo.  I also added support for calling autoheader, autoreconf, and 
> libtoolize directly as is already in place for aclocal, automake, and 
> autoconf. 
> Thanks for bringing this to light.

happy to hear that :-)

so which branch should I use to get the latest development release 
(which I guess works only for galileo)?

cheers
	Lorenzo

--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net