[news.eclipse.technology.linuxtools] Re: Using autoheader and libtoolize

[jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx (Jeff Johnston)]

Lorenzo Bettini wrote:

> Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > I had forgotten about AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
> >
> > > Anyway, I am not arguing about adding autoheader support, just that 
> > > the search for autogen.sh in the current logic is valid and needs to 
> > > be kept.  If a project has an autogen.sh file, it should be run.  If 
> > > it doesn't, then running autoheader is a logical next step as the 
> > > steps above may or may not have been done.
> >
> > I meant autoreconf, not autoheader above :)

> yes, I had inferred that ;-)

FYI, I have just added the support into trunk which will be for Galileo.  
I also added support for calling autoheader, autoreconf, and libtoolize 
directly as is already in place for aclocal, automake, and autoconf.  

Thanks for bringing this to light.