[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[news.eclipse.technology.kepler] How rich should the core collaboration model be?

The updates that I put out on the wiki show some thinking about the core model being very very simple. The idea being that all additional information should be handled outside the core model by use of the facets.

The dependency/relationship and artifact stuff needs more work though. Also I think that based on the work that Joakim did around the different types of meta-data there is probably some space for changes. One to note is changing description on the project to name.

I wanted to see what people's thoughts are on the model - I'll try and push up some thoughts on facets later this week if people are happy enough with the core structure. Also I would like to start a thread to talk about artifacts and another to talk about the dependency mechanisms - Buckminster has a lot of knowledge in this space and I'll reach out to them and see what their thinking is.

Cheers

P