[news.eclipse.technology.jwt] Re: JWT actions

["Guennadi Vanine" <vgv8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Fabrice,
I am certainly interested and repeat all your steps almost identically.
But my project continuation is redecided on monthly basis and certainly it 
cannot be more than 2-3 months more from now.
I am not sure in which I shall be in a month (or even weeks).

As a private person I am interested but I cannot represent/reveal yet any 
entity/company.
I myself just reevaluate my strategies (and even vision) and so far found 
your discussion quite revealing in order to propose my company to get back 
to vision phase what somehow was by-passed.

I am certainly shall share, participate,  and help, if I stay in this area 
and even platform.
Thank you for your information.

Guennadi Vanine

"Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:dptceb$ao8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>> Fabrice:
>> Sorry, I missed your train
>> Online where?
>> Can you repeat the link?
>> What I can find is only:
>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/jwt/
>>
>
> What I meant was that participants have been added to the online JWT 
> proposal. The initial code contribution will be put on temporary forge 
> platform as soon as that platform is ready which should hopefully today.
>
>> BTW, how can someone participate (since I have some impressions that this 
>> forum doesn't correspond to real activity and importance of this project)
>
> By now, we are in the proposal phase. That means that :
>
> * we must gather communities around the project
> * we need to discuss about the proposal on these points :
>   - interest of the project
>   - proposed architecture
>   - proposed ways to implement
>   - synergies with other eclipse projects.
>
> So if you're willing to participate, you're more than welcome. Please let 
> me know if you'd like to be considered as interested participant or as as 
> a committer.
> I've got the feeling that we're nearly ready to ask for creation review 
> but we still have to get our mind clear on few points :
> - Roman Zulauf is working on separating graphical representation, model 
> and grammar so that any visual representation and any grammar can be 
> plugged in.
> - possible use of EMF and GMF
> - use of BPMN as first representation
>
> Fabrice
>
>>
>> Guennadi Vanine
>> "Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>> news:dpjh4c$tf8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>Fabrice Dewasmes wrote:
>>>
>>>>Here is action list status
>>>>
>>>>- open public CVS (Open Wide) - I've requested the creation of a 
>>>>dedicated gforge on our platform
>>>>- put initial code contributions in CVS (Open Wide, Allen Young, 
>>>>Optena) - I've requested the creation of a dedicated gforge on our 
>>>>platform
>>>>- discuss about possible use of BPMN - in progress
>>>>- add people on proposal - requested add to Eclipse
>>>
>>>That's online now.
>>>
>>>>The GForge platform should be ready on next monday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Fabrice
>>
>>