[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
[News.eclipse.technology.gmf] Re: EMF properties view vs. GMF Editor properties view
|
- From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:36:21 -0400
- Newsgroups: eclipse.technology.gmf
- Organization: EclipseCorner
- Thread-index: Aca2MEIVgJnysiIjEduoEgAWy4cHeQ==
- Thread-topic: EMF properties view vs. GMF Editor properties view
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
Hi,
The bug is not yet resolved (status is still ASSIGNED), so I suspect the
patch that is attached is not yet in CVS, and therefore not available in a
build yet. Linda can verify this, I'm sure.
So, you'll need to apply this patch to GMF in a local development workspace
and use it that way. Information on how to do this is found on the
developer resources section of the website. Or, you can wait for this fix
to be provided in a build once committed.
I did notice that our links generated for site.xml are still incorrect, so
thanks for that!
Best,
Rich
On 8/2/06 8:20 AM, in article eaq562$441$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kannan
Ekanath" <kannan.ekanath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> Apologies if I am not understanding the obvious. I am pointing to the
> right update site
> "http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/update-site/releases/site.xml".
>
> To start with I am trying to add the two lines of code prescribed in
> the bug "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=141314" (from
> Linda) class "EMFCompositeSourcePropertyDescriptor" the bug says that
> the target milestone is 1.0.1 which I guess is not available from the
> update site,
> "http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/update-site/releases/site.xml"
> I downloaded some of the other builds mentioned in the download page,
> but none of them seems to have that fix I am looking for.
>
> a) Without going through the trouble of building GMF from source just
> for that extra line of code, can someone suggest me if that feature is
> available in any nightly/integration builds.
> b) I think since that file is simply independent of others even a simple
> class file would be enough (so that I can hack in the jar and replace it
> - until main release is available).
>
> Warm Regards,
> Kannan
>
> Richard Gronback wrote:
>> Hi Kannan,
>>
>> You will be able to upgrade to 1.0.1 using the update manager, provided you
>> change the URL to ./modeling/gmf and not ./technology/gmf (we recently
>> migrated from the Technology project to the Modeling project).
>>
>> Also, there should be a Callisto update site for all x.x.1 versions coming
>> at the end of September.
>>
>> Best,
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> On 8/2/06 5:36 AM, in article 44D07219.7020008@xxxxxxxxx, "Kannan Ekanath"
>> <kannan.ekanath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Linda,
>>> I am trying to follow the below mentioned bug which says that the target
>>> milestone is 1.0.1. I am trying to work out a *sane* way of upgrading my
>>> dependencies.
>>>
>>> Presently I have the following releases with me
>>> Eclipse: 3.2
>>> GEF : 3.2.0.v20060529
>>> EMF : 2.2.0.v200605300949
>>> GMF : 1.0.0.v200604142204
>>>
>>> I have used callisto update site to download these. Given this if I want
>>> to move to 1.0.1 (and 1.0.1 doesnt come up in the callisto update site)
>>> how do I migrate to GMF 1.0.1?
>>>
>>> a) Get GMF 1.0.1 build (GMF-SDK.zip), Get GEF, EMF builds again?
>>> b) I have a GMF release update site which throws a 404 error
>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/update-site/releases/site.xml)
>>>
>>> Can you suggest some way?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kannan
>>>
>>> Linda Damus wrote:
>>>> Hello Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> Looks like the same problem as
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=141314
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Linda
>>>>
>>
>