[news.eclipse.technology.epf] Re: Please Provide Feedback on OpenUP

["Ricardo Balduino" <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Great idea Ana. Done.


"Ana Valente Pereira" <apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:ejga5d$ppi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim... this post sould be placed on the site as well, near the download 
> section
>
> Ana Pereira
>
> Jim Ruehlin wrote:
>> The Eclipse Process Framework committers are interested in knowing how 
>> well people are doing in deploying OpenUP/Basic 0.9. There have been 
>> thousands of downloads of the process but we haven't received much 
>> feedback on the results people are experiencing. Understanding the 
>> successes and failures the OpenUP community is experiencing will help us 
>> to deliver more value in the future.
>>
>> If you've used OpenUP/Basic, even if it was just to review it as a 
>> potential process you might use, please respond to this post and answer 
>> the questions below. It should only take a couple of minutes of your 
>> time. You'll be helping to improve OpenUP for yourself and others.
>>
>>     * If you decided not to use OpenUP, please explain why.
>>     * How successful were you in deploying OpenUP? What specific
>>       problems did you encounter (e.g. lack of training, couldn't
>>       understand a particular guideline, etc)? What parts of the process
>>       were easy to deploy?
>>     * Are you using it as-is or are you modifying it?
>>     * If you're using EPF Composer, to what extent are you modifying
>>       OpenUP (e.g. minor text changes, replacing templates, changing
>>       entire disciplines, etc)?
>>     * What are the characteristics of your project (head count,
>>       timeframe, industry, greenfield or maintenance, successful
>>       delivery, etc)?
>>
>> Thanks for your input,
>>
>> Jim Ruehlin, EPF Committer
>> jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>