[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[news.eclipse.technology.epf] Re: modelling non-IT company / extend of EPC composer

Hello Jan.
You might be interested in this presentation from the last OMG meeting in 
St. Louis.

http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/06-04-12.pdf

At the end of this slide stack (pp. 34) you find a list of nine case studies 
I collected from different user groups that use SPEM2.0 concepts that have 
been implemented in EPF Composer to represent processes from all kinds of 
different domains. Several of these have nothing to do with software 
processes at all such as an ITIL-based process, an organizational governance 
process, integrated circuit development, or even a process for running 
investment clubs.

In respect to your request about extending EPF with new meta-model concepts: 
we do not support this at the moment.  You would need to modify the EPF 
Composer source or write extra plug-ins for that.  Please, let us know what 
kind of meta-model concepts you would introduce and we can discuss if this 
can be modeled with the concepts we currently realized or learn about new 
needs of our user community.

-- 


Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

PETER HAUMER
IBM | Eclipse Process Framework Committer
______________________________________________________________
"jan masaryk" <jan.masaryk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:770025ebad98b818f05b3bb1d0c004df$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi all,
>
> I am thinking if it's possible use EPF composer for modeling non-IT 
> company ...
> Just for now I don't see any reason which can block this kind of use. I 
> should maybe specify that I mean methodical modelling, not modelling for 
> BPM runtime server/languages (as BPEL runtime). What do you think about 
> this?
>
> Also when I think about alternative of use presented above, I have to ask 
> about possibility of extending key's modeling items as:
> - Work Product .... can I extend predefined types with custom one? 
> (artifact, deliverable, outcome)
> - Guidance ... can I extend predefined types with custom one? (checklist, 
> concept, ...)
>
> Thanks for all responses in advance!
>
> all the best,
> jan
>
> ps: epf composer is pretty good tool! keep running ... :-)
>