| [news.eclipse.technology.ejb-orm] Re: arent there now 2 official EJB3 Projects? |
|
[Crossposted from eclipse.technology.ejb-orm, subject is the overlap
between ejb-orm and jsr-220 projects] Robert Greene schrieb: This is really sad to hear about, as it is a precedence of substantial fragmentation to occur among eclipse technology sub-projects.This question of overlap and working together also came up in the JSR220-ORM projects Creation Review. I will tell you the same answer I gave the review committee. I think it would be best to have a single project. We attempted to participate in an open forum discussion moderated by other companies to see where we could work together . I laid out the entire scope of what we were doing publicaly and suggested ways we could collaborate and to my disappointment never received even a single response in the open forum or otherwise. Not even a response that said, "thank you for your offer, but we respectfully decline any involvement together". Instead, we got absolutely zero response. Hard to work as a single community towards a single solution with that level of communication. So, we continued forward building our own community and tooling which will be released shortly. Does the eclipse technology PMC have knowledge of this, namely Bjorn Freeman Benson? Is there nothing that can be done about it? Has there been any action taken on behalf of the PMC to consolidate the two projects into one? If yes, why did it not succeed, and if not, is there any reasoning behind it or has this potential for fragmentation been simply overlooked? Hoping for reason to come back in here, Jörg. Regards, Robert Greene JSR220-ORM Project Lead rgreene@xxxxxxxxxxx "Christian Sell" <christian.sell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:08bd344afb788abaacb8c30016122973$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... |