[news.eclipse.technology.eilf] Re: [Xml Storage] API :: XQJ Interface us

[Jürgen Schumacher <juergen.schumacher@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

with the assumption that we will put another EILF specific layer on top of
the generic API (as mentioned somewhere in the Wiki page) to make life  
easier
for service clients, it seems like an obvious choice to use something as  
the
generic API that will be standardized soon. And because I assume that you
have done a bit of research about such APIs, I trust you that XQJ is "the  
way
to go" in this area.

As for the options of porting XQJ to Java 1.5:

> c) As far as i can tell: i dont see a pressing need for the methods that 
> use that interface and we just could silently drop them -- although i  
> haveno clue what that means in regard to the rights of using then the  
> API.

sounds fine to me - at least technically - if the legal issues can be  
solved
(not my field of expertise, neither ...)

Cheers,
Juergen.