[news.eclipse.technology.eilf] Re: LETS VOTE!?

[Igor Novakovic <igor.novakovic@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I think that voting should be in a few steps. But it was good point to 
> rise a wave of ideas.
Yes. As I've suggested earlier, we should consider this voting as a some 
kind of "preselection" but not as the final decision.

> Guess acronyms that was not voted for should be forgotten, other 
> acronyms should be voted against with the different decodings.
Exactly!
We do have now about three or four "best candidates" so now we can 
eventually rethink the "decoding" and vote again. This time we should 
only select one favorite candidate - like Stefan earlier suggested.

BTW: If you have some good new suggestion, please post it!
The brainstorming is not ended until the final voting has been done.

Cheers
Igor