[news.eclipse.technology.eilf] Re: check new name 4 slang meanings

[Igor Novakovic <igor.novakovic@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > 3. have no negative annotation because of being a dirty slang word or 
> > such.
>
> what would be the reference we check against on this?
> eg: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=milc
Yes, We should take a look at www.urbandictionary.com when judging on 
our name, but I do not think we should overestimate the importance of 
this site.


> on the other hand: my guess is u can almost find anything there but i 
> would limit this to only well known ones. but how to know that?
Yep! Almost anything is "explained" there in more or less vulgar context.
Like you suggest, we should only take this information in count if the 
term is well known on this site.
For me "well known" means, that there are more than, let's say 100 
thumbs up on it.

Just a reminder: EILF has also been brought into a negative context by 
this site (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=eilf), but 
that did not stop us choosing it as the project proposal name.

Regards
Igor