[news.eclipse.technology.eilf] SMILLA ?!

[Mario Lenz <mario.lenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

following the proposal of Meike, I tend to like SMILLA, but I prefer

* Logistics vs. Life Cycle because the latter is usually more connected 
to versioning and such, i.e. content mgmt aspects which we dont't cover 
(yet?)
* Architecture vs. Application because we don't build a single 
application but rather a platform = architecture

So, that would mean:

SMILLA = SeMantic Information Logistics and Life cycle Architecture

Oppps, that still has Life cycle in...for the double-L...ideas?

Mario.