[news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relation

[Wendell Beckwith <wbeckwith@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm glab to here the idea of including a rules engine since that has 
been a topic for us also on an on-again off-again basis.  It usually 
pops up every 5 months or so before everyone agrees we have no time to 
work on it yet.

Wendell

Alex Antonau wrote:

> Wendell,
>
> Thank you for the hint.:-)
> Regarding remoting, I think we need something simple and completely 
> transparent for client and server.
> For example, a Remoting Runtime could parse XML descriptor, register a proxy 
> with specified service and pass all calls to another Remoting Runtime which 
> call the service locally.
>
> Also I forgot to mention a Rule engine as a subject to porting into OSGi.
>
> Alex
>
> "Wendell Beckwith" <wbeckwith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:e11hkm$216$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > 2PC is 2 Phase Commit (i.e. distributed transaction support).  As for 
> > remoting I would want to look into whether we can leverage Spring 2.0's 
> > remoting functionality from an implementation standpoint.
> >
> > Wendell
> >
> >    
>
>
>
>