[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
[news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
|
Wendell,
Thank you for the hint.:-)
Regarding remoting, I think we need something simple and completely
transparent for client and server.
For example, a Remoting Runtime could parse XML descriptor, register a proxy
with specified service and pass all calls to another Remoting Runtime which
call the service locally.
Also I forgot to mention a Rule engine as a subject to porting into OSGi.
Alex
"Wendell Beckwith" <wbeckwith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e11hkm$216$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Alex,
>
> 2PC is 2 Phase Commit (i.e. distributed transaction support). As for
> remoting I would want to look into whether we can leverage Spring 2.0's
> remoting functionality from an implementation standpoint.
>
> Wendell
>
- References:
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform
- [news.eclipse.technology.ecp] Re: More on the project name, and relationship to Rich Server Platform