[news.eclipse.technology.ecp] More on the project name, and relationship

[Ed Burnette <ed.burnette@xxxxxxx>]

I don't want to be the "naming police", but "ECP"? The C could be 
confused with Communication, Commerce, or whatever. And the P stands for 
Framework, that's a new one. "Component" can mean anything. No offense 
but ECP is a useless name that could describe dozens of different things.

IMHO what we need is something really simple, an incubator under Equinox 
to support the building of server applications using OSGi with a minimum 
of overhead and free from most legacy considerations. Wolfgang Gehner 
has coined the term "Rich Server Platform" for this (see 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=132897). What are the 
areas of overlap and non-overlap between the two ideas?