[news.eclipse.technology.ecf] Re: one suggest.

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Haides,

A question about this suggestion...is this driven mainly by a desire for 
brevity, or do you have an impression that 'SharedObject' is somehow 
miscommunicating?

Both are completely valid reasons for the suggestion, IMHO, but because 
of the package prefix we're using (i.e. org.eclipse.ecf.core.<whatever>) 
we've so far been hesitant to 'reuse' ECF in the class naming.

Thanks,

Scott


Haides Di wrote:
> 1.
> I suggest change the prefix from the "Shared" to "ECF".Because the 
> "ecf" is more rather to describe the namespace,it is propitious to 
> developers for reading and writting the code.
> For example:Li-Te wrote a section code:
>        ISharedObjectContainer chatLobby =
>           SharedObjectContainerFactory.
>              makeSharedObjectContainer("chatLobby");
>        ISharedObjectContainer chatSession =
>           SharedObjectContainerFactory.
>              makeSharedObjectContainer("chatSession");
>
> if it like below:
>        IEcfObjectContainer chatLobby =
>           EcfObjectContainerFactory.
>              makeEcfObjectContainer("chatLobby");
>
>        IEcfObjectContainer chatSession =
>           EcfObjectContainerFactory.
>              makeEcfObjectContainer("chatSession");