[news.eclipse.technology.buckminster] Re: Resolve gives me NullPointerEx

[Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,
Is the component in question a PDE plug-in project? It seems to me like the CVS access is OK (it 
does meta-data refetch etc.) and that the component is discriminated after that. If you use the 
componentType osgi.bundle, Buckminster will search for a meta-inf/manifest.mf, a plugin.xml, or a 
fragment.xml. If none of them are found, the component is skipped.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

Mark wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
> I changed my uri and I behaves differently now.
> (I reply this late because I first tried to get it working myself)
> This is the output I get the first time I click 'resolve to wizard'
> --------
> Found searchPath default for component com.company.application
> Metadata refetch from Wed Jan 16 15:38:25 CET 2008 for 
> :pserver:mark@xxxxxxxxxx:/cvs/com.application
> blocked(class org.eclipse.core.internal.events.AutoBuildJob[Building 
> workspace])
> Metadata refetch from Wed Jan 16 15:38:25 CET 2008 for 
> :pserver:mark@xxxxxxxxxx:/cvs/com.company.application
> blocked(class org.eclipse.core.internal.events.AutoBuildJob[Building 
> workspace])
> ERROR   [0001] : No suitable provider for component 
> com.company.application:osgi.bundle was found in searchPath default
>  ERROR   [0001] : Provider 
> cvs(:pserver:mark@xxxxxxxxxx:/cvs,com.company.application): No match 
> found for component com.company.application
> -------
>
> and this is the output i get the second time:
> -------
> Found searchPath default for component com.company.application
> ERROR   [0001] : No suitable provider for component 
> com.company.application:osgi.bundle was found in searchPath default
>  ERROR   [0001] : Provider 
> cvs(:pserver:mark@xxxxxxxxxx:/cvs,com.company.application): No match 
> found for component com.company.application
> -------
>
> any clues? ideas ? hints ? stuff I could try ?
>
>
> Just to avoid the basic mistakes, my cvs repo has the typically
> +HEAD
> +Branches
> +Versions
> Dates
>
> layout where my project is directly under the HEAD. Do I have to specify 
> this somewhere ?
>
> I'm already searching for 2 days now, I'm not sure I explain spending 
> much more time on buckminster without result...
>
> thanks!