[ews.eclipse.technology.aspectj] Re: aspect package

[Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>]

Depends on your point of view ... some people like it (so its a feature) 
... some people dont (so its a bug) ...

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45190

raised in 2003 ;)

Andy.

Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that unlike for regular java classes, Aspect package 
> declaration does not have to match physical location of .aj file. For 
> example, the following Aspect compiles using 1.5 AJC.
>
> === project/src/test/Foo.aj ===
> package does.not.seem.to.matter;
>
> public aspect Foo {
> }
> ===============================
>
> This is a bug, right?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor Fedorenko