Ali,
After I posted that last response, it occurred to me that you wrote:
> As you know, there are
> a number of Eclipse projects underway that stretch the traditional
> domain of Eclipse as a desktop environment. ... Are these [current dev
> process] criteria applicable to a server-side framework such as AFL?
Given the
> stated desire by Eclipse to expand beyond the developer IDE and host
the
> distributed server-side frameworks such as ALF, it would be crucial to
> properly refine the exit criteria corresponding to the various stages
in
> the Eclipse Lifecycle based on the type of the project.
Would you like to join the rev3 dev process effort and apply your ideas
and knowledge about how the process should be structured to include
server-side frameworks as well as the more traditional client-side
frameworks? That would definitely be helpful both to ALF (for future
reviews) and for the community as a whole (because our processes could
then better reflect where we want to go).
Regards,
Bjorn