[news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP pro

[Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No problem.  Let me know how it goes with the pde team.  If they can't help,
come back here, raise a bug, and I will try to find some time to look into
it.


On 09/07/09 10:54 PM, in article h36l2b$g68$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M.
Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok Andrew, I'll try with the PDE folks. Thank you so much for all your help.
> It was very kind of you.
> 
> Gaston.
> 
> Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> If I can handle product export with the regular PDE Build while using
>>> AJDT Build for just those plug-ins having aspects, it is not important.
>>> 
>>> I think it makes more sense to do it this way as it is using ajc for all
>>> projects, even for those which I know that don't have any aspect.
>>> 
>>> Is there any way to address it this way?
>> 
>> I don't know.  Can you export your aspect plugins separately from your
>> non-aspect plugins?
>> 
>> This might be a question better asked on the pde mailing list.
>