[news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP pro

["Gaston M. Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Comments inline.

Andrew Eisenberg wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 03/07/09 8:17 AM, in article h2l7f3$h1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M.
> Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for answering Andrew. I've added myself to the CC list of the bug.
> This bug has now been fixed.  Let me know if this addresses your
> non-headless build issues.
I got the bugzilla mail. Good news. What should I do to try it out? download 
a nightly build of AJDT for Galileo? or it is already published thru the 
update site.
> 
> 
>> 
>> So, just for you to know, I'm using Galileo release with the proper AJDT
>> version 2.0.0 and it seems that this build plugin is for AJDT 1.6.3. Am I
>> right?
> Yes.  This plugin is not officially supported by us.  We put it out there
> because some people were asking for it.  We use it (and a 3.5 version) to
> build AJDT itself.
> 
>> So I would like to know if there is any update of the AJDT PDE Build but
>> for last AJDT version 2.0.0 and if it supports the same that PDE one
>> does, such as p2 repository generation.
>> 
> I can package one up for you and post it to that bug report.  I don't
> think I can get to it today, but early next week.
Early next week would be pretty fine for me. I'm adding myself to this bug's 
CC list right now so I get notified when you post it.
> 
> Eventually, I may have to release it as a feature on the update site.
It would be really cool. There would be lot of people using aspectj in RCP 
products who need to build "headlesslly"

Last question.
Is this build delegating on PDE one so it only replaces PDE for compiling?
I ask it to know if I must contact you for problems (not related to 
AspectsJ) in the headless build process if I'm using this script or I should 
contact PDE folks.

Tank you very much for all your help. You have been very kind.
Gaston.