news.eclipse.technology.ajdt http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/maillist.html NewsGroup: news.eclipse.technology.ajdt en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:51:22 GMT Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:51:22 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss MHonArc RSS 2.0 RCFile webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) news.eclipse.technology.ajdt http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse.org-common/themes/Phoenix/images/eclipse_home_header.jpg http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/maillist.html [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01970.html It will be available from the dev update site: http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/35/dev/update It is not available yet, but should be within a few hours. Look at the time stamp for the build available from the site to see if it is the one produced to... > I got the bugzilla mail. Good news. What should I do to try it out? download > a nightly build of AJDT for Galileo? or it is already published thru the > update site. It will be available from the dev update site: http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/35/dev/update It is not available yet, but should be within a few hours. Look at the time stamp for the build available from the site to see if it is the one produced today. > Early next week would be pretty fine for me. I'm adding myself to this bug's > CC list right now so I get notified when you post it. Good. > It would be really cool. There would be lot of people using aspectj in RCP > products who need to build "headlesslly" Well, when I asked on the bug report and on the mailing list who would be interested in having this feature available from the update site, I got no responses, so I assumed there was little interest. > > Last question. > Is this build delegating on PDE one so it only replaces PDE for compiling? > I ask it to know if I must contact you for problems (not related to > AspectsJ) in the headless build process if I'm using this script or I should > contact PDE folks. What we do, and this is the reason why it is not "officially" supported, is that we branch the PDE build plugin and make the appropriate changes so that AJDT can be built. The only substantial change that we have made is to delegate to ajc instead of javac, but this small change cascades into a few other changes elsewhere in the plugin. It will probably work on other projects, but we have not tested it in detail (nor do we have the capacity to). --a ]]> Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:40:02 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01970.html andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxx (Andrew Eisenberg) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01969.html I got the bugzilla mail. Good news. What should I do to try it out? download a nightly build of AJDT for Galileo? or it is already published thru the update site. Early next week would be pretty fine for me. I'm adding myself to this bug's CC list right n... Comments inline. Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > > > > On 03/07/09 8:17 AM, in article h2l7f3$h1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M. > Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks for answering Andrew. I've added myself to the CC list of the bug. > This bug has now been fixed. Let me know if this addresses your > non-headless build issues. I got the bugzilla mail. Good news. What should I do to try it out? download a nightly build of AJDT for Galileo? or it is already published thru the update site. > > >> >> So, just for you to know, I'm using Galileo release with the proper AJDT >> version 2.0.0 and it seems that this build plugin is for AJDT 1.6.3. Am I >> right? > Yes. This plugin is not officially supported by us. We put it out there > because some people were asking for it. We use it (and a 3.5 version) to > build AJDT itself. > >> So I would like to know if there is any update of the AJDT PDE Build but >> for last AJDT version 2.0.0 and if it supports the same that PDE one >> does, such as p2 repository generation. >> > I can package one up for you and post it to that bug report. I don't > think I can get to it today, but early next week. Early next week would be pretty fine for me. I'm adding myself to this bug's CC list right now so I get notified when you post it. > > Eventually, I may have to release it as a feature on the update site. It would be really cool. There would be lot of people using aspectj in RCP products who need to build "headlesslly" Last question. Is this build delegating on PDE one so it only replaces PDE for compiling? I ask it to know if I must contact you for problems (not related to AspectsJ) in the headless build process if I'm using this script or I should contact PDE folks. Tank you very much for all your help. You have been very kind. Gaston. ]]> Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:50:40 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01969.html gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxx (Gaston M. Tonietti) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01968.html This bug has now been fixed. Let me know if this addresses your non-headless build issues. Yes. This plugin is not officially supported by us. We put it out there because some people were asking for it. We use it (and a 3.5 version) to build AJDT itself. ... On 03/07/09 8:17 AM, in article h2l7f3$h1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M. Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for answering Andrew. I've added myself to the CC list of the bug. This bug has now been fixed. Let me know if this addresses your non-headless build issues. > > So, just for you to know, I'm using Galileo release with the proper AJDT > version 2.0.0 and it seems that this build plugin is for AJDT 1.6.3. Am I > right? Yes. This plugin is not officially supported by us. We put it out there because some people were asking for it. We use it (and a 3.5 version) to build AJDT itself. > So I would like to know if there is any update of the AJDT PDE Build but for > last AJDT version 2.0.0 and if it supports the same that PDE one does, such as > p2 repository generation. > I can package one up for you and post it to that bug report. I don't think I can get to it today, but early next week. Eventually, I may have to release it as a feature on the update site. ]]> Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:55:44 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01968.html andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxx (Andrew Eisenberg) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01967.html Thanks for answering Andrew. I've added myself to the CC list of the bug. But I still have the problem, I'm not able to export my product with aspects support. Do you know what I am doing in the meanwhile? I have to copy compiled aspects from my project output folder into the plugin jar inside the product zip :O (thanks Midnight Commander for supporting that!!). So every time I have to export a new Milestone, it is a pain you know where :-) I also have to make a headless build to work. I have it working after following instructions from Andrew Niefer' blog "Building p2 RCP products in Eclipse 3.5M6", but guess what... without aspects working :-) I found a solution for that in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641#c12 I replaced this line: <ant antfile="${eclipse.pdebuild.scripts}/productBuild/productBuild.xml" /> with this one: <ant antfile="${ajdt.pdebuild.scripts}/productBuild/productBuild.xml" /> but I got this error: BUILD FAILED project-releng/buildProduct.xml:21: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/scripts/productBuild/productBuild.xml:20: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/scripts/build.xml:46: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml:73: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml:18: java.net.MalformedURLException: no protocol: ${eclipseBaseURL} I also tried replacing with this line as the bug comment says: <ant antfile="${ajdt.pdebuild.scripts}/build.xml" /> but I got this error: BUILD FAILED project-releng/buildProduct.xml:21: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/scripts/build.xml:28: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/scripts/build.xml:68: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml:12: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/templates/headless-build/allElements.xml:16: The following error occurred while executing this line: project-releng/org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build_1.6.3.200808060918/scripts/genericTargets.xml:88: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.eclipse.pde.internal.build.BundleHelper.getRuntimeJavaProfiles()[Ljava/lang/String; So, just for you to know, I'm using Galileo release with the proper AJDT version 2.0.0 and it seems that this build plugin is for AJDT 1.6.3. Am I right? So I would like to know if there is any update of the AJDT PDE Build but for last AJDT version 2.0.0 and if it supports the same that PDE one does, such as p2 repository generation. Thanks a lot. Gaston. Andrew Eisenberg wrote: > Binary cycles when exporting are not currently supported in AJDT, but > there is a bug open for this: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268667 > > There is a patch, which I am planning on integrating soon. Please add > your name to the cc there and you will be notified of its progress. > > The patch will only be applied to the 3.5 stream as Eclipse 3.4 does not > allow binary cycles. > > > On 02/07/09 9:02 AM, in article h2ilm2$u5h$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M. > Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I have a problem when I want to export my RCP product. >> >> As I have some aspects in my project I tried to export it using "Eclipse >> product with AspectJ support" export wizard, but the export >> fails with the following error: >> >> Export feature error >> A cycle was detected when generating the classpath ... >> >> I know this problem is fixed in JDT. "Eclipse product" export wizard has >> a nice and useful checkbox called "Allow for binary cycles in >> target platform", but if I use this wizard I don't have any aspect in the >> exported product, compiled aspects are not present in the >> plug-in jar so I get this error at startup: >> >> Cannot register non aspect: .... >> >> So, I wonder if there is any way to tell AJDT export wizard to allow for >> binary cycles just as JDT one does. >> >> Thank you very much for your time. >> Gaston. ]]> Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:17:56 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01967.html gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxx (Gaston M. Tonietti) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01966.html Binary cycles when exporting are not currently supported in AJDT, but there is a bug open for this: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268667 There is a patch, which I am planning on integrating soon. Please add your name to the cc there and you will be notified of its progress. The patch will only be applied to the 3.5 stream as Eclipse 3.4 does not allow binary cycles. On 02/07/09 9:02 AM, in article h2ilm2$u5h$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gaston M. Tonietti" <gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have a problem when I want to export my RCP product. > > As I have some aspects in my project I tried to export it using "Eclipse > product with AspectJ support" export wizard, but the export > fails with the following error: > > Export feature error > A cycle was detected when generating the classpath ... > > I know this problem is fixed in JDT. "Eclipse product" export wizard has a > nice and useful checkbox called "Allow for binary cycles in > target platform", but if I use this wizard I don't have any aspect in the > exported product, compiled aspects are not present in the > plug-in jar so I get this error at startup: > > Cannot register non aspect: .... > > So, I wonder if there is any way to tell AJDT export wizard to allow for > binary cycles just as JDT one does. > > Thank you very much for your time. > Gaston. ]]> Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:42:28 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01966.html andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxx (Andrew Eisenberg) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Binary cycles while exporting RCP product http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01965.html Hi guys, I have a problem when I want to export my RCP product. As I have some aspects in my project I tried to export it using &quot;Eclipse product with AspectJ support&quot; export wizard, but the export fails with the following error: Export feature error A cycl... Hi guys, I have a problem when I want to export my RCP product. As I have some aspects in my project I tried to export it using "Eclipse product with AspectJ support" export wizard, but the export fails with the following error: Export feature error A cycle was detected when generating the classpath ... I know this problem is fixed in JDT. "Eclipse product" export wizard has a nice and useful checkbox called "Allow for binary cycles in target platform", but if I use this wizard I don't have any aspect in the exported product, compiled aspects are not present in the plug-in jar so I get this error at startup: Cannot register non aspect: .... So, I wonder if there is any way to tell AJDT export wizard to allow for binary cycles just as JDT one does. Thank you very much for your time. Gaston. ]]> Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:02:07 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01965.html gaston.tonietti@xxxxxxx (Gaston M. Tonietti) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: AJDT 2.0.0 + Eclipse 3.5 ClassNotFoundException http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01964.html That's the one! The plugin is missing for some reason. I reinstalled the AJDT from scratch and everything works just fine. Thanks for your help! That's the one! The plugin is missing for some reason. I reinstalled the AJDT from scratch and everything works just fine. Thanks for your help!

]]> Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:41:08 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01964.html fuzebest@xxxxxxx (Fu Zebest) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: AJDT 2.0.0 + Eclipse 3.5 ClassNotFoundException http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01963.html The plugin is org.aspectj.ajde. Make sure that the plugin is installed and the version should be 1.6.5.20090618034232 (although if it is a slightly different version, should be OK). Also, make sure that the class exists inside of that plugin. Did you install through the update site or through a zip file? On 30/06/09 1:14 AM, in article 99d22748aae8ee9183f4ccd56a4dd516$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fu Zebest" <fuzebest@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Did you have any problems with installation or do you have any other errors >> in your error log? > > No there was no problem with a clean Eclipse installation with a clean > workspace. > The log file is filled with the exception stacktraces all rooted to the > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.aspectj.ajde.core.ICompilerConfiguration. > Even more weird thing - I cannot find this class anywhere in my Eclipse > installation. Which plugin contains it? > > Forgot to mention the exact AJDT version - 2.0.0.e35x-20090625-1000. > ]]> Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:17:32 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01963.html andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxx (Andrew Eisenberg) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: AJDT 2.0.0 + Eclipse 3.5 ClassNotFoundException http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01962.html No there was no problem with a clean Eclipse installation with a clean workspace. The log file is filled with the exception stacktraces all rooted to the java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.aspectj.ajde.core.ICompilerConfiguration. Even more weird thing ... 
Did you have any problems with installation or do you have any other errors
in your error log?

No there was no problem with a clean Eclipse installation with a clean workspace.
The log file is filled with the exception stacktraces all rooted to the
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.aspectj.ajde.core.ICompilerConfiguration.
Even more weird thing - I cannot find this class anywhere in my Eclipse installation. Which plugin contains it?

Forgot to mention the exact AJDT version - 2.0.0.e35x-20090625-1000.


]]> Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:14:12 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01962.html fuzebest@xxxxxxx (Fu Zebest) [news.eclipse.technology.ajdt] Re: AJDT 2.0.0 + Eclipse 3.5 ClassNotFoundException http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01961.html The important part of the exception stack trace is below. This says that for some reason, ICompilerConfiguration was not found. And this cascades to a bunch of other exceptions, first that the ajdt.core plugin cannot be started, and then that AJSourceTransformer cannot be loaded (because its plugin cannot be started). I am not sure why ICompilerConfiguration cannot be found. But it is possible that your ajdt installation failed in some way and therefore the org.aspectj.ajde plugin cannot be loaded. Did you have any problems with installation or do you have any other errors in your error log? On 29/06/09 8:59 AM, in article d4d52d0fc34d9d024e7889129299d9a7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fu Zebest" <fuzebest@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.aspectj.ajde.core.ICompilerConfiguration > at > org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClassInternal(BundleLoader.j > ava:489) > at > org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:405) > at > org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:393) > at > org.eclipse.osgi.internal.baseadaptor.DefaultClassLoader.loadClass(DefaultClas > sLoader.java:105) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) > ... 75 more ]]> Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:38:50 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/newsLists/news.eclipse.technology.ajdt/msg01961.html andrew.eisenberg@xxxxxxx (Andrew Eisenberg)