[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
] [
Newsgroup Home
]
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
From
:
douglas.clarke@xxxxxxxxxx
(Doug Clarke)
Date
: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:21:26 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups
:
eclipse.rt.eclipselink
Organization
: Eclipse
User-agent
: NewsPortal/0.36 (http://florian-amrhein.de/newsportal)
I would vote for your solution where the transfer is committed first in its own transaction with booked=false. That makes sure the must have operation is written and cannot be lost.
Doug
Follow-Ups
:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
From:
tbee
References
:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] in memory rollback
From:
tbee
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
From:
Gordon Yorke
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
From:
tbee
Prev by Date:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
Next by Date:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
Previous by thread:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
Next by thread:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: in memory rollback
Index(es):
Date
Thread