[news.eclipse.platform] Re: TreeViewer databinding question

["Boris Bokowski" <Boris_Bokowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> - ObservableMap & ObservableMapLabelProvider naturally assume that all
>   objects passed in hold the attributes defined which is for trees not
>   always correct

The current (beans, pojo, and EMF) implementations of ObservableMap make 
this assumption. You could implement your own... (and contribute it back) 
;-)

> - The value one sets as an input get's part of the knowElements-map and
>   hence passed to the ObservableMap. This is the biggest problem as far
>   as I can tell currently although support for different ObservableMaps
>   for different tree-levels would also make the whole thing more usable

I believe this was fixed very recently, for 3.4.1 and 3.5.

Boris