[news.eclipse.platform] Re: eclipse developer plans for compatibilty wit

["Darin Swanson" <Darin_Swanson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

3.1 is due out in the 2Q2005 
(http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/eclipse_project_plan_3_1.html)
I would suggest jumping on a 3.1 milestone build (M4 is coming out Dec 17) 
and testing out the level of support that is available.

I really know nothing about the CVS support...strictly a user. :-)

Darins

"Neil" <nmorley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:cosqmi$smd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks Darin for the response. I saw the bug report previously, but it 
> didn't have any info on timing of new eclipse versions, or specific 
> incompatibilities that eclipse 3.1 might address. Do you have any specific 
> informaton that 3.1 will be out soon (the bug report was from june I 
> think), and more fully compatible with cvs 1.12.9? I guess I am trying to 
> decide whether to force my developers to tough it out for a few 
> weeks/months, or just downgrade my cvs to 1.11.17 and give up on the ldap 
> for the time being. Thanks again all for any information you have.
>
>
> Darin Swanson wrote:
>
>> Looks like in the 3.1 stream they are attempting to keep up with the 
>> changes
>> in the dev of 1.12.9
>
>> Check https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 as an example
>> (comment #1)
>
>> HTH
>> Darins
>
>> "Neil" <nmorley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:cor0j1$nhp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> I am interested to use ldap to authenticate my cvs users, but this 
>>> feature
>>> is only available in the 1.12.9 (I guess beta) release of cvs. But my 
>>> java
>>> developers complain of incompatibilities between eclipse 3.0.1 and cvs
>>> 1.12.9. Does anyone know the plans and timescales for resolving these
>>> incompatibilites? THanks for the information.
>>>
>
>