[news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: KTable, any comment?

["Robert B" <oh1226@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Tom Schindl" <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:fs8lo6$6hn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Robert B schrieb:
>> "Carfield Yim" <carfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>> news:fs5vav$5mr$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> We already using VITUAL, with all data in a in memory collection, but it
>>> still painfully slow if the records grows, for horizontal scrolling (
>>> may be we have too many columns? we can have up to 100 columns) and
>>> filtering ( well I currently we are sorting at table but not at that in
>>> memory collection... may be that is a bottomneck we need to address... )
>>
>> If you rely sorting of Table, your table no longer takes advantage of
>> VIRTUALity! It will read all the records and sort and render, which
>> means very slow performance.

What I meant was that basically we should provide sorted information
outside tables, dynamically on demand by tables, not relying on
tables' own builtin functions.

R.