[news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intende

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Newsgroup Home]

[news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?

From: "Robert Bjervås" <smurfturf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:33:20 +0100
Newsgroups: eclipse.platform.swt
Organization: EclipseCorner

Thanks Jeremy, Stefan and Alex,

Your help has been most valuable. There is clearly a lot of reasons for not 
subclassing. Unfortunately is it probably the only practical solution since 
we must cover all possible situations. It is not enough to listen only on 
mouse clicks as in your solution Jeremy.

/Robert

Follow-Ups:
- [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?
  - From: Stefan Langer

References:
- [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?
  - From: Robert Bjervås

Prev by Date: [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Dynamic placement of composites on composites
Next by Date: [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?
Previous by thread: [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?
Next by thread: [news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Why is composites like Table not intended to be subclassed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread