[news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packagi

["Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@xxxxxxxxx>]

"SWT/JFace in Action". I just ran into the point where the authors add 
osgi.jar. I will follow your recomendation though and update the README 
in my app and the variables in the eclipse project.

Thanks

-H

Chris wrote:
> boot.jar is empty now.  Adding workbench.jar won't hurt you but is not 
> necessary.
>
> The lack of the osgi.jar should be problematic.  Its possible you just 
> haven't any JFace that references the osgiclasses.  I don't know what book 
> you are using but it may be referring to 2.1 not 3.0.
>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:cslegs$pko$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:
> >
> > swt.jar
> > runtime.jar
> > boot.jar
> > workbench.jar
> >
> > Both list work. Why?
> >
> > -H
> >
> > Chris wrote:
> >
> > > Now:
> > > swt.jar
> > > jface.jar
> > > runtime.jar
> > > osgi.jar
> > >
> > > If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
> > > swt.jar
> > > jface.jar
> > > utility.jar
> > >
> > > -Chris
> > >
> > > "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> > > news:cshoeh$8ru$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it 
> > > > is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress 
> > > > is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in 
> > > > order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would 
> > > > reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once 
> > > > the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > -H