[news.eclipse.platform.swt] Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packagi

["Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@xxxxxxxxx>]

Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:

swt.jar
runtime.jar
boot.jar
workbench.jar

Both list work. Why?

-H

Chris wrote:
> Now:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> runtime.jar
> osgi.jar
>
> If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> utility.jar
>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:cshoeh$8ru$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it 
> > is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress 
> > is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in 
> > order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would 
> > reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once 
> > the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -H