"Steve Blass" <swb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d7nk55$f0e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For 3.01 I had to create a feature that contained everything MY feature
requires for a base RCP platform. Then I was able to deal with my
application as two features, the one I wrote and my RCP base feature.
Without that base feature I had the same kind of complaints about
required things that were in fact already in place.
Your remark makes a lot sense to me.
To add to your point, the update manager might be confused if your RCP
feature has requirements which do not exist in other features. How could it
resolve that?