[news.eclipse.modeling.mdt] Re: [Announce] Papyrus component proposal

["Sébastien Gérard" <sebastien.gerard@xxxxxx>]

Hi Tom,

currently we are working on the tool. You can alreday see what we have done 
untill now and follow the evolution here:
https://speedy.supelec.fr/Papyrus/svn/Papyrus/core/experiment/papyrus-gmf/

We have a meeting to prepare the first bundle of code we intend to provide 
to Eclipse fo IP review early november, the 5th. And then, it will be in the 
hand of the Eclipse IP review team...

BTW, what is your interest for Papyrus?

Regards,

--Séb




"Kenn Hussey" <Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news: 
gd8k8a$g0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tom,
>
> The component has been created (and announced to the membership) and is 
> mostly provisioned; I believe the team intended to post the initial code 
> contribution sometime in November (perhaps Sebastien can confirm). All 
> discussion related to this component should now take place on the Papyrus 
> newsgroup (eclipse.papyrus, copied) and developers' mailing list 
> (mdt-papyrus.dev).
>
> Kenn
>
> "Tom Morris" <tfmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:gd8bka$ajn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Kenn Hussey wrote:
>>
>>> We will be conducting a vote by the MDT committers in the near future to 
>>> have this component created. Stay tuned.
>>
>> Any update on the status of the proposal?
>>
>> The proposal gives a list of proposed package/plugin names.  Is there a 
>> mapping from the existing Papyrus/TopcaseD/whatever package names to the 
>> new package names so that we can at least look at the existing code to 
>> see what it looks like?
>>
>> e.g. com.cea.papyrus.truc --> org.eclipse.papyrus.scribe.machin
>>
>> The original proposal said that technical discussion was going to take 
>> place in this newsgroup, but that's obviously not happening.  Is there a 
>> better forum to participate in?  It's been years since I worked at 
>> Sophia-Antipolis, so my French is a little rusty, but I should still be 
>> able to manage French-only forums if that's necessary.
>>
>> Tom
>
>