[news.eclipse.modeling.mdt] Re: [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metam

["Dave Carlson" <dcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Jordi,
Your work on UML/OCL to SBVR transformation is of keen interest to me and 
your contributions are very welcome. I have an interest in applying this to 
research I am doing in healthcare standards, specifically vocabulary and 
constraints for patient health records.

I checked in the first version of the SBVR metamodel to CVS yesterday. 
Please see the wiki pages for brief documentation: 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT-SBVR , especiallly the page links for metamodel 
issues and metamodel modifications. Your feedback on usability of the 
metamodel for transformation will be very important. The CMOF definition 
published by OMG is quite difficult to work with in EMF due to the way they 
model associations in CMOF.

Regards,
Dave Carlson

"Jordi Cabot" <jcabot@xxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:ftnbs9$gdt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
>
> I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model 
> tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it 
> becomes available.
>
> Jordi Cabot
> Open University of Catalonia
> www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
> jcabot@xxxxxxx
>
>
>