[news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.uml2] Re: Operations Package Export in GenMod

[johntimm@xxxxxxxxxx (John T.E. Timm)]

Hi James,

I will submit a defect. I also noticed some issues with switching back and 
forth between using operations packages and not using operations packages 
between a model and subsequent derived models. More specifically, I found 
that the EOCL_ENV field does not get generated properly if you switch back 
and forth. I made some adjustments to a couple of the other templates 
(namely OperationsClass.javajet and insert.javajetinc) to ensure that 
EOCL_ENV gets generated properly.

Thanks,

JT

James Bruck wrote:

> Hi John,

> This does seem like a bug.    Please raise a defect on UML2 and possibly 
> contribute a patch if you have one.
> This could possibly be a candidate for the maintenance release.

> Cheers,
> - James.

> "John T.E. Timm" <johntimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:321b6d7c3f8041ac23eb451481ec4d97$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I ended up customizing the manifest.mfjet template to get the required 
> > behavior. This does appear to be a shortcoming of the current implemention. 
> > If I create a model that uses operations packages and then another model 
> > which extends the first, I will get code that doesn't compile until the 
> > manifest file is manually updated.
> >
> > JT
> >
> > John T.E. Timm wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to specify in the GenModel that the Operations Package 
> > > should get exported so that it can be used by other projects that further 
> > > specialize the model and also use an Operations Package? I am currently 
> > > adding an entry to the manifest.mf file manually.
> >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > > JT
> >
> > > NOTE: I originally posted this message in eclipse.model.mdt, but feel 
> > > that perhaps the UML2 newsgroup is more appropriate.