[news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.uml2.uml] Re: Are these associations not impl

["James Bruck" <jbruck@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Sunny

Very interesting.  I can see the relationships you refer to in the older 
05-07-04 version of the spec. but cannot see any Activity.getVariables() 
etc. in the older implementation.   Such functions do exist in the newer 
implementation as well as helpers such as createVariable() and 
getVariable(...).
I'm not sure why that does not exist in the older implementation.   I'll 
have to ask Kenn about that and get back to you.  (It might be the case that 
these variables were introduced in the spec after the implementation was 
complete)

Happy New Year,

- James.


"Sunny" <sunfire001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:65396381ce89b8d31d280a0dd67e91b3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> I found that some associations in UML2.0 superstructure were not 
> implemented in the uml2_1.1.1. For example, Activity.variable (pp. 297) 
> and BehavioralFeature.ownedParameter (pp.29), etc. The javadoc of each 
> class of the metamodel has a "supported features" section, but I am 
> wondering if there exists a complete list of all those 
> unsupported/supported associations. Thank you.
>
> Happy new year,
>
> -- Sunny
>
>
>
>
>
>