[news.eclipse.modeling.m2m] Re: [ATL] Merging ATL transformations?

[Matthias Bohlen <infomail@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2007-03-20 07:44:10 +0100, Dennis Wagelaar <dennis.wagelaar@xxxxxxxxx> said:

> > Example: When I have transformations A, B and C, can I really have a 
> > transformation D which simply contains the following additional line:
> >
> >    uses A, B, C;
>
> Well, you won't have a physical transformation "D", but the result of 
> superimposing A, B and C on top of eachother is equivalent.

What do you mean by "I won't have D"? You mean, I should not write a 
transformation D which superimposes A, B, and C? What would be the 
correct way to do it?

Cheers
Matthias