[news.eclipse.modeling.gmt.amw] Re: [ATL] Injection problem in qATL

[ivanomalavolta@xxxxxxxx (Ivano)]

Hi Marcos, this is one of my rules:

rule createBinding(featName : MOF!"String", element : 
ATL!SimpleOutPatternElement, var : ATL!VariableDeclaration) { -- : 
ATL!Binding
	to
		atl : ATL!Binding(
			outPatternElement <- element,
			propertyName <- featName,	
			value <- val
		),
		val : ATL!NavigationOrAttributeCallExp(
			name <- featName, 
			source <- valSource
		),
		valSource : ATL!VariableExp(
			referredVariable <- var
		)
	do {
		atl;
	}
}

The calling of the rule works, but somewhere in the return elements goes 
wrong;
in fact everything works if I remove the "to" section of the rule and I 
print the input parameters in the "do" section.

I ask this to you, because I tested the same rule with the old AMW4ATL and 
everything works correctly...

Do you have any suggestion?

Regards, Ivano   

Marcos Didonet Del Fabro wrote:

> Hi Ivano,

> the code of the rules with error are in 'normal' ATL files or the code 
> is injected using the .inject ('OUT','ebnf', <exp>) method?

> There are two things to pay attention when developing called and lazy rules:

> - in called rules, you should have a return expression at the end of the 
> imperative part;

> - in lazy rules, the type of the input pattern should be respected.


> Regards,

> Marcos

> Ivano wrote:
> > Hi Marcos, I am using the modified version of AMW4ATL and I still have 
> > problems:
> > when a called rule (that returns something) is executed I get an 
> > EmptyStack exception;
> >
> > when a lazy rule is executed I get an ClassCastException;
> >
> > These exceptions arise only if I use the modified version of AMW4ATL, do 
> > you have any idea about this issue??
> >
> > Thank you, Ivano