[news.eclipse.modeling.gmt.amw] Re: AMW is now compatible with Eclipse 3

[Stéphane LACRAMPE <stephane.lacrampe@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks for your answer Marcos.

Stephane

Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> Hi Stephane,
>
> Actually, I didn't spend much time trying to make the same binary 
> compatible with both versions of EMF (2.2 and 2.3).
>
> This is because the main objective was to have a new version compatible 
> with EMF 2.3, Eclipse 3.3 and ATL 2.0RC2, since many users were asking 
> for that.
>
> So, I cannot say for sure if there are any technical reasons that might 
> prevent from having such a version.
>
> In the ideal situation, the procedures you did to update your tools 
> could be applied to AMW as well. In this case, it is more a question of 
> time.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcos.
>
> PS.: btw, I think this issue should also be studied with respect to 
> ATL/AM3 plug-ins.
>
> Stéphane LACRAMPE wrote:
> > Hi Marcos,
> >
> > In understand and agree that there are some real changes between the 
> > two EMF versions but from a technical point of view, it is possible to 
> > have versions of tools that are compatible with the two EMF versions. 
> > Basically we managed that achieve that with all our tools.
> >
> > Is there any particular technical reason that might definitely prevent 
> > from having a compatible version with EMF 2.2 and EMF 2.3 or would it 
> > be more a question of time to do it you think ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Stephane
> >
> > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > you should use the latest version of AMW with Eclipse 3.3 (and EMF 
> > > 2.3), and the previous releases with Eclipse 3.2 (EMF 2.2). This is 
> > > due to some changes in the way models are handled in EMF 2.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Marcos.
> > >
> > > Nathalie Lepine wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is there a AMW version compatible with eclipse 3.3 (with EMF 2.3) 
> > > > and eclipse 3.2 (with EMF 2.2) ?
> > > >
> > > > Nathalie Lépine
> > > >
> > > > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The sources of AMW have been updated to be compatible with Eclipse 
> > > > > 3.3, EMF 2.3 and the latest versions of ATL and AM3 plug-ins. A 
> > > > > binary release will be available soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > AMW CVS: 
> > > > > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/org.eclipse.gmt/AMW/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Marcos.
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The sources of AMW have been updated to be compatible with Eclipse 
> > > > > 3.3, EMF 2.3 and the latest versions of ATL and AM3 plug-ins. A 
> > > > > binary release will be available soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > AMW CVS: 
> > > > > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/org.eclipse.gmt/AMW/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Marcos.

> Hi Stephane,
>
> Actually, I didn't spend much time trying to make the same binary 
> compatible with both versions of EMF (2.2 and 2.3).
>
> This is because the main objective was to have a new version compatible 
> with EMF 2.3, Eclipse 3.3 and ATL 2.0RC2, since many users were asking 
> for that.
>
> So, I cannot say for sure if there are any technical reasons that might 
> prevent from having such a version.
>
> In the ideal situation, the procedures you did to update your tools 
> could be applied to AMW as well. In this case, it is more a question of 
> time.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcos.
>
> PS.: btw, I think this issue should also be studied with respect to 
> ATL/AM3 plug-ins.
>
> Stéphane LACRAMPE wrote:
> > Hi Marcos,
> >
> > In understand and agree that there are some real changes between the 
> > two EMF versions but from a technical point of view, it is possible to 
> > have versions of tools that are compatible with the two EMF versions. 
> > Basically we managed that achieve that with all our tools.
> >
> > Is there any particular technical reason that might definitely prevent 
> > from having a compatible version with EMF 2.2 and EMF 2.3 or would it 
> > be more a question of time to do it you think ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Stephane
> >
> > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > you should use the latest version of AMW with Eclipse 3.3 (and EMF 
> > > 2.3), and the previous releases with Eclipse 3.2 (EMF 2.2). This is 
> > > due to some changes in the way models are handled in EMF 2.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Marcos.
> > >
> > > Nathalie Lepine wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is there a AMW version compatible with eclipse 3.3 (with EMF 2.3) 
> > > > and eclipse 3.2 (with EMF 2.2) ?
> > > >
> > > > Nathalie Lépine
> > > >
> > > > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > > Marcos Didonet Del Fabro a écrit :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The sources of AMW have been updated to be compatible with Eclipse 
> > > > > 3.3, EMF 2.3 and the latest versions of ATL and AM3 plug-ins. A 
> > > > > binary release will be available soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > AMW CVS: 
> > > > > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/org.eclipse.gmt/AMW/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Marcos.
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The sources of AMW have been updated to be compatible with Eclipse 
> > > > > 3.3, EMF 2.3 and the latest versions of ATL and AM3 plug-ins. A 
> > > > > binary release will be available soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > AMW CVS: 
> > > > > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/org.eclipse.gmt/AMW/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Marcos.

begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:St=C3=A9phane LACRAMPE
n;quoted-printable:LACRAMPE;St=C3=A9phane
org:Obeo
url:http://www.obeo.fr
version:2.1
end:vcard