[news.eclipse.modeling.gmt.amw] Re: New AMW use case - metamodel compari

[Marcos Didonet Del Fabro <marcos.didonet-del-fabro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pierre,

I think this would be great. Since the approach is generic, it can be applied to different 
metamodels. I am interested to apply it to SAM metamodels.

Do you have these metamodels in Ecore?

We can apply the existing matching transformations to create a weaving model between the 
SAM metamodels.

Depending on the result, we can also develop different heuristics more adapted to your 
scenario.


Regards,

Marcos.


Pierre GAUFILLET wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> very interesting use case !
> In TOPCASED, we have to find an efficient way to build compatibility 
> bridges each time meta-models evolve (UML 2.0 > UML 2.1 for example).
>
> (Semi-)automatic creation of such transformations would be of great help.
>
> As currently SAM meta-model is changing, we could try to apply this 
> weaving model on it. What do you think about it ?
>
> Pierre