[news.eclipse.modeling.amalgam] Re: Unable to install DSL Toolkit

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

If you're following the book, you should use the Ganymede edition:
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/amalgam/dsltk/downloads/drops/I20081128
-0606/index.php

Unfortunately, there is no 64 bit version for Linux.  I have built one for
M8 based on Galileo, but it's not promoted yet.

Best,
Rich


On 7/1/09 4:54 PM, in article
dd872609a93892e1ab06a84c944419bc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Flavelle Ballem"
<fballem@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am running Galileo and trying to follow some examples in the book,
> "eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit".
> 
> As part of that, I'm trying to install the DSL Toolkit from the Amalgam
> project, but I get the following error:
> 
> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not
> be found.
>   Software being installed: DSL Toolkit 1.0.0.v200905210858
> (org.eclipse.amalgam.dsltk.product 1.0.0.v200905210858)
>   Missing requirement for filter
> (&(osgi.os=linux)(osgi.ws=gtk)(osgi.arch=x86_64)): Eclipse RCP
> 3.5.0.v20090506-9SA-FwxFtqHA7O_ZPyAv-cGC (org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group
> 3.5.0.v20090506-9SA-FwxFtqHA7O_ZPyAv-cGC) requires
> 'org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64 [3.5.0.v3548c]' but it could not be found
>   Cannot satisfy dependency:
>     From: DSL Toolkit 1.0.0.v200905210858
> (org.eclipse.amalgam.dsltk.product 1.0.0.v200905210858)
>     To: org.eclipse.platform.feature.group
> [3.5.0.v20090513-9fEdG1HFtGcZlCVLSVqmsTcdv4RgTlPeD]
>   Cannot satisfy dependency:
>     From: Eclipse Platform
> 3.5.0.v20090513-9fEdG1HFtGcZlCVLSVqmsTcdv4RgTlPeD
> (org.eclipse.platform.feature.group
> 3.5.0.v20090513-9fEdG1HFtGcZlCVLSVqmsTcdv4RgTlPeD)
>     To: org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group
> [3.5.0.v20090506-9SA-FwxFtqHA7O_ZPyAv-cGC]
> 
> Please be aware that I am running on ubuntu 9.04 AMD64 and have eclipse
> for Linux 64-bit installed. I'm also a newbie to eclipse, so if that's
> part of the problem, then some detail on how to correct the problem would
> be much appreciated.
> 
> Many thanks, both for the solution, and your patience!
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Rich