[News.eclipse.foundation] Re: [PROJECT] - Collaboration and Government I

["Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

We do hope to create a project similar to this in the future. Currently we
are moving the Eclipse IT infrastructure and hopefully acquiring some new
hardware. So our focus for the next little while is going to be on
re-implementing our current function in a new environment while maintaining
stability and performance.

It will likely be a few months before we start thinking about how to
significantly enhance the website content and processes. Perhaps we are
being overly conservative, but we feel that we need to keep the number of
moving parts to a minimum while we migrate our site. We feel that we cannot
afford the risk of a major interruption to our developers or community.

/mike
--------------------
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director,
Eclipse Foundation

"Panagiotis Korros" <pkorros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ckc3qu$iml$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is a great idea!
>
> Currently eclipse lacks common structure/infrastructure for all projects.
>
> Many projects use different mechanisms to address the same problems
> (e.g. downloads, planning).
> The eclipse website has many navigational problems. The downloads link
> allows to download only the Eclipse SDK/Platform, it should also allow
> downloading of other eclipse project downloads like EMF,XSD etc.
>
> Many projects (especially new ones) are not OPEN enough. eg. they don't
> have meeting notes in their web sites, they don't have published plans.
>
> I think that a project like this could help the eclipse foundation to
> gain consistent look and functionality across all projects.
>
> ilias wrote:
> > The Eclipse Foundation most important project is... not existent!
> >
> > The "Collaboration and Government Infrastructure" project.
> >
> > This project would implement a systems similar to SourceCast, with
> > additional modules dealing with the governance issues of a fast growing,
> > large scale open source system like the eclipse foundation.
> >
> > Examples modules:
> > - forums (mailinglist, newsgroups, html-groups)
> > - CVS
> > - CMS for project content
> > - Meeting
> > - ...
> >
> > *JAVA*
> > The project would use available java solutions (prefered) or write
> > java-wrappers to existing non-java solutions (should be avoided).
> >
> > Focusing on java technology enables easy integration of functionality
> > into the eclipse IDE, increasing efficiency of the developement process.
> >
> > *self-hosting*
> > - Eclipse would have a project where many other eclipse.projects would
> > be used for developement.
> > - By using j2EE/EJB: the webtools project, Pollinate
> > - BIRT project for reporting
> > - TPTP
> > - ...
> >
> > *self-hosting RCP*
> > - The project would result additionally in an RCP-application, which
> > would have a much more convenient GUI than a web-based collaboration
> > system.
> >
> > Possible contributors for this project would be:
> > - JAVA Open-Source projects
> > - The hosted eclipse projects
> > - Vendors like SourceCast
> > - Webhosting providers
> >   - ensuring solution can be easily hosted @providers
> >   - increasing use of java technology
> > - ...
> >
> > -
> >
> > As the creation of an eclipse project takes some time, possibly a first
> > step should be made within the technology project (subproject, category
> > incubation )
> >
> > This would allow to start earlier on such a project (for/during the
> > eclipse.org transfer IBM = > eclipse Foundation (http://www.magma.ca) ).
> >
> > Another possibility would be, to create a subproject "www-transfer"
> > within platform (which seems to manage website related stuff anyway)
> > - place all code/files in CVS (mailinglist configuration files, scripts,
> > website, ...)
> > - discuss and decide about smooth, quick and save transistions.
> > - let the community (and its experience) assist with those transistions.
> >
> > Most important:
> > - let the community have (at least some) influence on resources they
> > have to use!
> >
> > -
> >
> > Some more information:
> >
> > Re: [ECLIPSE.ORG] Issues - [was: Re: BIRT Charter Approved]
> >
http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=30245&group=eclipse.platform
> >
> >
> > .
> >