[news.eclipse.dsdp.rtsc] Re: Configuro Output

[bgriffis@xxxxxx (Brad Griffis)]

dave russo wrote:

> Brad Griffis wrote:
> > Yes, I think a --quiet would be good.  In the case of some kind of 
> > error/warning then it would be good for it to tell us that it's an error 
> > compiling a file or whatever it might be.  In other words, don't tell me 
> > what you're doing unless something goes wrong.  In most cases I would 
> > expect/hope to get enough info from the error message to fix the problem 
> > without having to turn off --quiet and re-do the build.
> >
> > So potentially this may require a little re-working of some error 
> > messages.  If the error message is overly dependent on the user having 
> > all the status info then we may want to repeat that info in the error 
> > message.
> The problem is that the configuration process involves many tools that 
> XDC does not control; as a result, many of the error messages _can't_ be 
> changed.  For example, errors can come from the target's 
> compiler/linker, GNU make, cygwin, ...

Let's try it out and we'll see how it goes.  If nothing else, once we get 
things building properly it will be nice to throw the --quiet switch and 
simplify/shrink the build output.