[news.eclipse.tools.pdt] Re: [Announce] PDT 2.0.1 M200901080831 is avail

[fdias.webdev@xxxxxxxxx (Fernando Dias)]

I am having the same problem that rapkasta cited.

but I download the M200901080831 fix, SDK (Runtime, Source), Runtime and 
Automated Tests, unziped the files in plugins/features folders, but the 
problem persists.

I am doing something wrong ? How can I resolve this ?

thanks


Nick Boldt wrote:

> If you look at the PDT homepage (http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/) you should 
> see:

> 26th of June, 2009  	- PDT 2.1 Release
> 29th of December, 2008 	- PDT 2.0 Release

> The project plan is for 2.0; a 2.1 plan has not yet been drafted as the 
> 2.1 cycle only started this week.

> And yes, 2.1.0 WILL supercede 2.0.0, if you also plan to move up from 
> Eclipse 3.4 to 3.5.

> Jasmo Hiltula wrote:
> > Nick Boldt wrote:
> > > That should have read BIG numbers, not bug numbers.
> > >
> > > Nick Boldt wrote:
> > > > Generally, bug numbers == newer.
> > > >
> > > > 2.0.1 are maintenance fixes for 2.0.0, targeted for Eclipse 3.4.
> > > > 2.1.0 is a work-in-progress, targeted for Eclipse 3.5 and to be
> > > > released at the end of June.
> > > >
> > > > So, it depends on if you're using Eclipse 3.4.x or 3.5.x, really.
> > > >
> > > > rapkasta@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > > Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:02:09 +0500, Build Monkey
> > > > > <pdtBuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> МапОÑ?ал:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The following build [1] will be available at eclipse.org in the next
> > > > > > 30-60 mins.
> > > > > > [1]
http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/downloads/?project=pdt&showAll=1&hlbuild=M200901080831#M200901080831
> > > > > > Updated release notes [2] will be available within to 24hrs.
> > > > > > [2]
http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/news/relnotes.php?project=pdt&version=M200901080831
> > > > > >
> > > > > Cool, my problem is solved.
> > > > > But can anybody tell what version is the lates (i don't understand
> > > > > it): 2.0.1 OR 2.1.0 ?
> >
> > I was also confused, i thought 2.1.0 supercedes 2.0, but it seems that i
> > was wrong. You guys should update the project plan, it does not mention
> > 2.1.* at all :)