[news.eclipse.tools.pdt] Re: PDT and Galileo

[roy@xxxxxxxx (Roy Ganor)]

Actually as a team member in PDT I don't have any problem joining the 
Galileo train (and I will vote +1) - "mission impossible" == mission 
possible but hard ;-). if the community wants us to be part of it I guess 
that we should discuss about it in the pdt-dev mailing list and see if 
there is a demand for such a request. 

- Roy

Nick Boldt wrote:

> "I understand why this is considered one of the benefits of the 
> simultaneous release, however, the PDT project was unable to commit to 
> the Ganymede time line (due to various reasons I would rather not go 
> into here)." - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=238960#c2

> "From an internal perspective, whoever knows the PDT community which 
> built a great community of PHP users that have zero knowledge in 
> Java/Eclipse, understands that keeping Eclipse PDT with Ganymede is a 
> "mission impossible" task as we have many dependencies that we should 
> follow and sync." - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=238960#c10

> I've no idea why PDT 2.1 can't be part of Galileo. In the interest of 
> transparency, perhaps their dev team can provide some insights?I